| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Function call |
| Date: | 2004-01-27 21:54:23 |
| Message-ID: | 28955.1075240463@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> writes:
> I'll read the rest of the mail more careful tomorrow moring, I just want
> to point out directly that for calls that doesn't use named arguments you
> get the exact same speed as before. Except for an extra if() to check if
> there are named arguments. I don't understand why you think that this will
> affect the current behaviour.
It looked to me like you were talking about a major redesign of
func_select_candidate and friends. I'll be interested to see how you do
it without that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2004-01-27 21:55:49 | Re: Write cache |
| Previous Message | ohp | 2004-01-27 21:48:42 | Re: Write cache |