"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 11:39 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Spitballing here, but could sqlite be an intermediate, compromise solution?
>> For a core PostgreSQL component ?!?!?
> Sure, why not?
Because it's fifty times more mechanism than we need here? We don't
want a SQL interface (not even a lightweight one) and it's unclear that
we ever want the data to go to disk at all.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-02-28 20:03:33|
|Subject: Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ... |
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2011-02-28 19:57:09|
|Subject: Re: Sync Rep v17|