Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Date: 2011-02-28 20:02:30
Message-ID: 28931.1298923350@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 11:39 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Spitballing here, but could sqlite be an intermediate, compromise solution?
>> 
>> For a core PostgreSQL component ?!?!?

> Sure, why not?

Because it's fifty times more mechanism than we need here?  We don't
want a SQL interface (not even a lightweight one) and it's unclear that
we ever want the data to go to disk at all.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-28 20:03:33
Subject: Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2011-02-28 19:57:09
Subject: Re: Sync Rep v17

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group