Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Why would it be useful to use pg_size_pretty on xlog locations?
> The point is that it would be useful to use it on the difference
> between two xlog locations,
Um, that is exactly the claim I was questioning. Why is that useful?
> but that is a numeric value, not int8, because of signedness issues.
See my followup --- this statement appears factually incorrect,
whatever you may feel about the usefulness issue.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Thom Brown||Date: 2012-03-09 15:02:56|
|Subject: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-03-09 14:55:09|
|Subject: Re: xlog location arithmetic |