Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> So I'm back to proposing that we just apply FPI-free WAL records
> unconditionally, without regard to the LSN.  This could potentially
> corrupt the page, of course.

Yes.  So you're still assuming that there will be a later FPI-containing
WAL record to fix up the mess you created.  What if there isn't?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: FPI at 2011-02-01 02:28:43 from Robert Haas

Responses

• Re: FPI at 2011-02-01 17:47:03 from Robert Haas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2011-02-01 17:44:05
	Subject: Re: Spread checkpoint sync
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2011-02-01 17:39:12
	Subject: Re: Authentication Enhancement Proposal