Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> So I'm back to proposing that we just apply FPI-free WAL records
> unconditionally, without regard to the LSN. This could potentially
> corrupt the page, of course.
Yes. So you're still assuming that there will be a later FPI-containing
WAL record to fix up the mess you created. What if there isn't?
regards, tom lane
In response to
- Re: FPI at 2011-02-01 02:28:43 from Robert Haas
- Re: FPI at 2011-02-01 17:47:03 from Robert Haas
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-02-01 17:44:05|
|Subject: Re: Spread checkpoint sync|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-02-01 17:39:12|
|Subject: Re: Authentication Enhancement Proposal |