Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Anybody have a problem with adopting this behavior?
>> Seems a bit surprising.
> Yeahh.. I'm not really sure about mkdir -p type actions from a SQL
> command. Not entirely sure why but it doesn't feel 'right' to me. I'd
> rather have PG complain "that directory doesn't exist".
OK. Is there any value in doing mkdir -p in WAL-recovery execution of
CREATE TABLESPACE but not regular execution?
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-12-11 16:13:12|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use symbolic names not octal constants for file permission flags |
|Previous:||From: Dmitriy Igrishin||Date: 2010-12-11 15:28:20|
|Subject: Re: proposal: auxiliary functions for record type|