Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: stats_block_level

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: stats_block_level
Date: 2007-07-31 18:30:27
Message-ID: 28796.1185906627@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Or we could get radical and rename both of them...

> Well, it is a bit misleading to have the query_string stuff be named
> "stats" when it's not actually collected by pgstats at all.  Maybe
> rename it to "collect_query_string".  With the other name being
> "collect_stats", they would show up together in SHOW ALL.

query_string is pretty misleading these days too, since pg_stat_activity
includes a lot more than the bare query string.

If we were doing this on a blank slate I would suggest "track_stats"
and "track_activities", but that might be too different from what
people are used to.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-07-31 18:38:33
Subject: Re: default_text_search_config and expression indexes
Previous:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2007-07-31 18:28:26
Subject: Re: default_text_search_config and expression indexes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group