Re: Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD
Date: 2006-12-29 16:17:49
Message-ID: 2878.1167409069@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I'm actually wondering if unlimiting core might not be a useful switch
> to provide on pg_ctl, as long as the platform has setrlimit().

Not a bad thought; that's actually one of the reasons that I still
usually use a handmade script rather than pg_ctl for launching
postmasters ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Moran 2006-12-29 16:24:28 Re: What's the difference between postgresql.conf.sample
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-12-29 16:17:38 Re: What's the difference between postgresql.conf.sample

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-12-29 16:49:23 Re: XML support in MSVC build
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-12-29 16:02:53 Re: Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD