Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CF3+4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CF3+4
Date: 2013-01-17 06:06:13
Message-ID: 28751.1358402773@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> If you postpone the start of the last commit fest to mid-February, I'd
> expect that we will have a much larger number of patches.

Since some people seem to be under the impression that new work is still
okay to submit now, you have a point ... we are definitely past what was
envisioned as the deadline for new 9.3 patches.

			regards, tom lane


In response to

  • Re: CF3+4 at 2013-01-17 05:01:26 from Peter Eisentraut

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2013-01-17 06:38:31
Subject: Re: Hot Standby conflict resolution handling
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2013-01-17 06:00:15
Subject: Re: tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group