Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
Date: 2011-10-28 19:53:27
Message-ID: 28740.1319831607@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yeah, I find that unlikely as well. But leaving Asserts in place would
>> tell us.

> OK.  Should I go do that, or are you all over it?

Go for it.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-10-28 19:54:16
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-10-28 19:51:25
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group