Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Tony Simopoulos" <karkalis(at)earthling(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
Date: 2000-10-25 15:56:32
Message-ID: 28714.972489392@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
"Tony Simopoulos" <karkalis(at)earthling(dot)net> writes:
> i must have missed something.  when did outer join's start working?

They're in current CVS (7.1-to-be).  CVS tip is pretty unstable at
the moment with WAL stuff going on, but you could use it as a playpen
installation.  Or wait for 7.1 beta, which should be out real soon now.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stephan SzaboDate: 2000-10-25 16:01:03
Subject: Re: A rare error
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-10-25 15:50:45
Subject: Re: Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-10-25 18:01:57
Subject: Re: signals in ODBC?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-10-25 15:50:45
Subject: Re: Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group