Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures
Date: 2006-08-29 12:39:47
Message-ID: 28614.1156855187@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> My objection here is basically that this proposal passed on the
>> assumption that it would be very nearly zero effort to make it happen.

> Kicking out autovacuum as default is a disaster, it took far too long to
> get in the backend already (wasn't it planned for 8.0?).

If it's so "disastrous" to not have it, why wasn't it even proposed
until two weeks after feature freeze?  Sorry, I'm not buying this
argument.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-08-29 12:55:10
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Another VPATH patch for ecpg
Previous:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2006-08-29 12:36:21
Subject: Re: ECPG connection target formats

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group