Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> My objection here is basically that this proposal passed on the
>> assumption that it would be very nearly zero effort to make it happen.
> Kicking out autovacuum as default is a disaster, it took far too long to
> get in the backend already (wasn't it planned for 8.0?).
If it's so "disastrous" to not have it, why wasn't it even proposed
until two weeks after feature freeze? Sorry, I'm not buying this
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-08-29 12:55:10|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Another VPATH patch for ecpg |
|Previous:||From: Michael Meskes||Date: 2006-08-29 12:36:21|
|Subject: Re: ECPG connection target formats|