| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_config |
| Date: | 2004-07-20 02:33:15 |
| Message-ID: | 2860.1090290795@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I know it's not critical, but is it worth rewriting pg_config in C so it
> works on Windows (or alternatively writing it as a .bat file for Windows)?
I doubt it. People can always just read the file to see what settings
are in it, and it's not like nonexperts are going to have a variety of
different configurations that we're gonna have to ask them about.
(Even in the Unix world, pg_config is not really needed when most people
are installing one of a small number of RPM-type packages...)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-07-20 02:39:16 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-20 02:23:44 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2004-07-20 03:07:10 | Docs for PL/Perl |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-20 02:23:39 | Re: pg_config |