| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Thomas H(dot)" <me(at)alternize(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Peter Brant" <Peter(dot)Brant(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #2712: could not fsync segment: Permission |
| Date: | 2006-10-23 20:59:22 |
| Message-ID: | 28539.1161637162@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
"Thomas H." <me(at)alternize(dot)com> writes:
> with process explorer i can actually check which postgres.exe instance (in
> all cases i've checked its just 1 instance, and always just 1 file) holds
> the lock for the file in question.
So which one is it?
> the postgres instance that holds the lock eventually closes the filehandle
> after some minutes. the process itself is not killed but continues
> thereafter.
That sounds a bit like what I'd expect the bgwriter to do, but the
bgwriter is also the one trying to issue the fsync.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas H. | 2006-10-23 21:08:07 | Re: BUG #2712: could not fsync segment: Permission |
| Previous Message | Thomas H. | 2006-10-23 20:49:37 | Re: BUG #2712: could not fsync segment: Permission |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas H. | 2006-10-23 21:08:07 | Re: BUG #2712: could not fsync segment: Permission |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-23 20:57:32 | Re: COPY does not work with regproc and aclitem |