Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:12:10PM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> Michael, can we try to install the first two patches?
> If I understood the rest of the thread correctly this is not needed anymore,
I think it would be a good idea, just to have all that code using
identical #includes. Rmi's problem may be a platform bug rather
than something we can fix ourselves, but I think that making sure that
ecpg uses the exact same coding that's been proven in the backend
will forestall problems on other platforms.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Garick Hamlin||Date: 2010-02-26 16:26:23|
|Subject: pgbouncer + psql 9.0a4|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-02-26 16:11:31|
|Subject: Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG |