| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [Resend: Domains and function] |
| Date: | 2004-02-20 16:33:39 |
| Message-ID: | 28407.1077294819@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> so ISTM that your example is certainly a deficiency if not a bug.
I believe it is a bug or at least an unimplemented feature in plpgsql:
plpgsql has its own implementation of casting, and is not aware that
casting to a domain should involve running check constraints.
The same might be true of the other PL languages, not sure.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | elein | 2004-02-20 17:55:27 | Re: [HACKERS] [Resend: Domains and function] |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-02-20 16:10:30 | Re: [HACKERS] [Resend: Domains and function] |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | elein | 2004-02-20 17:55:27 | Re: [HACKERS] [Resend: Domains and function] |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-02-20 16:10:30 | Re: [HACKERS] [Resend: Domains and function] |