From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | John Huttley <john(at)mwk(dot)co(dot)nz> |
Cc: | "pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere |
Date: | 2003-04-01 05:13:44 |
Message-ID: | 28385.1049174024@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
John Huttley <john(at)mwk(dot)co(dot)nz> writes:
> This isn't more that a month or two old.
Okay, it wasn't real clear...
> The previous version worried about nested transactions.
It still should. I see no prospect that nested xacts will be in 7.4,
and I wouldn't care to bet they'll be in the release or two after ...
On a more positive note:
* NUMERIC does indeed do the unspecified-precision thing.
* If you can't be bothered to rename datatypes, CREATE DOMAIN would
serve to provide Oracle-compatible names for Postgres datatypes.
There is some parse-time overhead associated though.
* CREATE OR REPLACE does exist for some object types now --- views and
functions for sure, don't recall anything else.
* Postgres *does* do sub-SELECT-in-FROM, which is what I think is meant
by the references to embedded views.
* On the outer join syntax issue: PG supports the SQL-standard syntax,
which I believe is also supported by recent Oracle releases. Consider
migrating away from Oracle's proprietary syntax.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-04-01 05:33:52 | Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere |
Previous Message | John Huttley | 2003-04-01 04:55:17 | Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere |