Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: APC/socket fix (final?)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Claudio Natoli" <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: APC/socket fix (final?)
Date: 2004-03-26 23:06:16
Message-ID: 28265.1080342376@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>>> Hopeless, or cute, work-around?
>> 
>> It's possibly workable in the limited context of the postmaster, but
>> I've got doubts about doing it in libpq where we can't assume we know
>> what the surrounding application will do.

> No need to touch the frontend parts at all. Our APCs are server side
> only, so it's not a problem there.

Oh really?  What if the surrounding app uses APCs?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Claudio NatoliDate: 2004-03-26 23:12:12
Subject: Re: APC/socket fix (final?)
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-03-26 23:04:32
Subject: Re: APC/socket fix (final?)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group