Re: Patch: update Bonjour support to the newer non-deprecated API

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch: update Bonjour support to the newer non-deprecated API
Date: 2009-09-08 16:11:55
Message-ID: 28262.1252426315@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Should we inject some sort of compile-time rejection of the
> compatibility API? Like, say

> #ifdef AVAHI_SERVICE_COOKIE
> #error The Avahi implementation is incompatible
> #endif

> inside some #ifdef BONJOUR block?

I looked into this and couldn't find any obvious candidate symbol to
test for. I'm not that excited about throwing roadblocks in the way
of somebody who wants to try it, anyway --- my feeling is more like
"if it breaks you get to keep both pieces".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-09-08 16:12:10 RfD: more powerful "any" types
Previous Message Sam Mason 2009-09-08 16:11:02 Re: Adding integers ( > 8 bytes) to an inet