Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Win32 BYTE_ORDER

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Win32 BYTE_ORDER
Date: 2006-10-19 20:11:43
Message-ID: 2825.1161288703@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> Done, but I think you forgot the defs for LITTLE_ENDIAN and 
>> friends ... it seems unlikely that a platform would provide 
>> those and then forget BYTE_ORDER.

> Well, it compiled just fine, so it must've found it somewhere :-)

I think the #if tests probably reduced to 0 == 0 ... so my bet is
it compiled but didn't work.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-10-19 20:12:42
Subject: Beta, RC Time?
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2006-10-19 20:07:40
Subject: Re: Win32 BYTE_ORDER

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2006-10-19 20:21:00
Subject: oid2name optargs
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2006-10-19 20:07:40
Subject: Re: Win32 BYTE_ORDER

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group