Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option
Date: 2003-07-31 05:28:02
Message-ID: 28212.1059629282@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I didn't like the functions ending in _ext.  I renamed them to _pp for
> pretty print.  Patch attached and applied.

Seems to be shy a catversion bump; since you have just made an
incompatible change in the internal-function-names array, one is needed.

But I disagree with your opinion anyway --- _ext for "extended" made
perfect sense to me, especially for the get_indexdef one which adds more
than just prettyprint functionality.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-07-31 05:37:12
Subject: Re: hexadecimal to decimal
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2003-07-31 05:21:29
Subject: Re: hexadecimal to decimal

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group