Paul Schlie <schlie(at)comcast(dot)net> writes:
> - however regardless, if some form of error detection ends up being
> implemented, it might be nice to actually log corrupted blocks of data
> along with their previously computed checksums for subsequent analysis
> in an effort to ascertain if there's an opportunity to improve its
> implementation based on this more concrete real-world information.

This feature is getting overdesigned, I think.  It's already the case
that we log an error complaining that thus-and-such a page is corrupt.
Once PG has decided that it won't have anything to do with the page at
all --- it can't load it into shared buffers, so it won't write it
either.  So the user can go inspect the page at leisure with whatever
tools seem handy.  I don't see a need for more verbose logging.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: Block-level CRC checks at 2008-10-01 19:43:34 from Paul Schlie

Responses

• Re: Block-level CRC checks at 2008-10-01 20:10:35 from Jonah H. Harris

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Jonah H. Harris	Date: 2008-10-01 20:10:35
	Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2008-10-01 19:53:11
	Subject: Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch