Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: knngist - 0.8

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: knngist - 0.8
Date: 2011-02-28 19:25:15
Message-ID: 28087.1298921115@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Since no one has stepped up to fix these issues, I have marked this
>>> patch Returned with Feedback.

>> This is just contrib/btree_GIST, yes?

> Yes, core KNN was committed by Tom during the November CommitFest.

Right.  However, it's disappointing that this isn't in, because the
number of use cases for KNN-gist in core isn't very large.  We really
need support for KNN in btree_gist to make it useful.

Given that it is a contrib module, I personally wouldn't object to it
getting patched later, like during alpha or beta.  But somebody's got
to do the work, and I've got a dozen higher-priority problems right now.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2011-02-28 19:26:08
Subject: Re: mysql2pgsql.perl update
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2011-02-28 19:22:59
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN doesn't show sufficient info for wCTE cases

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group