Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump incredibly slow dumping a single schema from a large db

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mike Roest <mike(dot)roest(at)replicon(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump incredibly slow dumping a single schema from a large db
Date: 2012-03-31 21:44:05
Message-ID: 28037.1333230245@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Mike Roest <mike(dot)roest(at)replicon(dot)com> writes:
> Any idea when 9.1.4 with this change will be out so we can pull the cluster
> up.

Well, we just did some releases last month, so unless somebody finds a
really nasty security or data-loss issue, I'd think it will be a couple
of months before the next set.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas 2012-03-31 23:58:02 Re: Problems with Binary Replication
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-03-31 21:38:58 Re: Problems with Binary Replication

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2012-03-31 22:01:52 Re: measuring lwlock-related latency spikes
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2012-03-31 21:34:33 Re: Publish checkpoint timing and sync files summary data to pg_stat_bgwriter