Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: linked list rewrite

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
Cc: sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>,PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: linked list rewrite
Date: 2004-03-23 19:45:36
Message-ID: 27923.1080071136@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net> writes:
> On Mar 23, 2004, at 8:39, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
>> Which brings me to another question .. has anybody considered using
>> subversion instead of CVS ?

> 	My guess would be only people who haven't used arch.  :)

This reminds me quite a lot of a discussion that was just happening on
a Red Hat mailing list.  It seems the great thing about revision control
systems is there are so many to choose from ;-) ... and plenty of people
willing to proselytize for their favorite.

AFAICS, though, CVS is not broken for our needs.  I don't see an
adequate reason to change.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-23 19:47:00
Subject: Re: linked list rewrite
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-23 19:35:18
Subject: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml ...

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-23 19:47:00
Subject: Re: linked list rewrite
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2004-03-23 19:34:37
Subject: Re: Smallint - Integer Casting Problems in Plpgsql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group