Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net> writes:
> On Mar 23, 2004, at 8:39, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
>> Which brings me to another question .. has anybody considered using
>> subversion instead of CVS ?

> 	My guess would be only people who haven't used arch.  :)

This reminds me quite a lot of a discussion that was just happening on
a Red Hat mailing list.  It seems the great thing about revision control
systems is there are so many to choose from ;-) ... and plenty of people
willing to proselytize for their favorite.

AFAICS, though, CVS is not broken for our needs.  I don't see an
adequate reason to change.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: linked list rewrite at 2004-03-23 17:18:11 from Dustin Sallings

Responses

• Re: linked list rewrite at 2004-03-24 08:28:42 from Dustin Sallings

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2004-03-23 19:47:00
	Subject: Re: linked list rewrite
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2004-03-23 19:35:18
	Subject: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml ...

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2004-03-23 19:47:00
	Subject: Re: linked list rewrite
Previous:	From: Robert Treat	Date: 2004-03-23 19:34:37
	Subject: Re: Smallint - Integer Casting Problems in Plpgsql