| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net> |
| Cc: | sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: linked list rewrite |
| Date: | 2004-03-23 19:45:36 |
| Message-ID: | 27923.1080071136@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net> writes:
> On Mar 23, 2004, at 8:39, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
>> Which brings me to another question .. has anybody considered using
>> subversion instead of CVS ?
> My guess would be only people who haven't used arch. :)
This reminds me quite a lot of a discussion that was just happening on
a Red Hat mailing list. It seems the great thing about revision control
systems is there are so many to choose from ;-) ... and plenty of people
willing to proselytize for their favorite.
AFAICS, though, CVS is not broken for our needs. I don't see an
adequate reason to change.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-23 19:47:00 | Re: linked list rewrite |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-03-23 19:34:37 | Re: Smallint - Integer Casting Problems in Plpgsql |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-23 19:47:00 | Re: linked list rewrite |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-23 19:35:18 | pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml ... |