Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> It also just strikes me as just the wrong way to go about solving the
>> apparent problem.
> I thought an API for postgresql.conf is what we agreed to, but I don't
> see it on the TODO list. Is that correct?
Like you, I seem to recall some prior discussion along this line, but
I think it didn't get solid enough to produce a TODO item. Right now
the best we could do is
* Better support for remote database administration, eg, APIs
to change configuration and restart the postmaster
which is mighty vague.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2005-07-25 15:26:52|
|Subject: Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2005-07-25 15:16:42|
|Subject: Re: regression failure on stats test|