Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Any better plan for this query?..

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri <dimitrik(dot)fr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Any better plan for this query?..
Date: 2009-05-18 23:00:56
Message-ID: 2788.1242687656@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> In particular, running the tests repeatedly using 
> 	H.REF_OBJECT = '0000000001'
> rather than varying the value seems likely to benefit MySQL.

... mumble ... query cache?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Scott CareyDate: 2009-05-19 00:51:19
Subject: Re: Any better plan for this query?..
Previous:From: DimitriDate: 2009-05-18 22:33:07
Subject: Re: Any better plan for this query?..

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group