"Moshe Ben-Shoham" <mosheb(at)nexperience(dot)com> writes:
> I believe there are two problems here: one is the process 2604 exiting
> with code 128, and the other one is the re-initialization failure with
> the following fatal message: "BST FATAL: pre-existing shared memory
> block is still in use".
The second problem is most likely going to be resolved by this recent fix:
I have no idea what is provoking an exit(128) though.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-admin by date
|Next:||From: Alan McKay||Date: 2009-06-01 01:14:50|
|Subject: Re: Efficiently searching for CIDRs containing an IP address|
|Previous:||From: Nikhil Sontakke||Date: 2009-05-31 07:37:20|
|Subject: Re: ruby connect|