Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>,pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial
Date: 2004-07-23 20:30:40
Message-ID: 27773.1090614640@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> I don't consider the concept broken.  The implementation is, in fact,
> broken, and putting that broken piece in the tutorial is, imnsho, a
> bad mistake.

If we're going to remove from the tutorial every feature for which any
aspect is deemed by someone to be broken, the tutorial is liable to
become quite short.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2004-07-23 20:40:36
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2004-07-23 20:28:22
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Mike MascariDate: 2004-07-23 20:39:05
Subject: Re: ffunc called multiple for same value
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2004-07-23 20:28:22
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group