Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Date: 2010-03-02 00:18:31
Message-ID: 27741.1267489111@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
"Ed L." <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> writes:
> On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 17:15, Tom Lane wrote:
>> user(at)host shouldn't be a problem, but if there were an @ by
>> itself or starting a token, it might possibly cause something
>> like this.

> There is one, looks like a typo got in.  How do I fix it?

Hmm, a user named @, or what?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Ed L.Date: 2010-03-02 00:23:14
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous:From: Ed L.Date: 2010-03-02 00:17:06
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Ed L.Date: 2010-03-02 00:23:14
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous:From: Ed L.Date: 2010-03-02 00:17:06
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group