Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Date: 2010-03-02 00:15:36
Message-ID: 27671.1267488936@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
"Ed L." <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> writes:
> On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 16:57, Tom Lane wrote:> 
>> Now that I look more closely at those line numbers, it looks
>> like the thing thinks it is processing an include file.  Are
>> there any @ signs in your global/pg_auth file?

> Yes, indeed, there are many.  My user names are "user(at)host" form, 
> and have been for years.  Would that be a problem now?

user(at)host shouldn't be a problem, but if there were an @ by itself or
starting a token, it might possibly cause something like this.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Ed L.Date: 2010-03-02 00:17:06
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous:From: Ed L.Date: 2010-03-02 00:12:36
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Ed L.Date: 2010-03-02 00:17:06
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous:From: Ed L.Date: 2010-03-02 00:12:36
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group