Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> The docs need some improvement, but I'm not aware of any major remaining
> issues with the patch.
I object VERY strongly to the part of the patch that inserts a
deparse_query_list() call into exec_parse_message(). That is not a
cheap operation, and imposing that sort of overhead on every Parse
message is entirely unacceptable from a performance point of view.
I see no need for it either. What's wrong with regurgitating the
original source string, which is already saved in prepared queries?
Other than that show-stopper, the patch looks reasonable at first glance.
regards, tom lane