Re: bug or simply not enough stack space?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Frank van Vugt <ftm(dot)van(dot)vugt(at)foxi(dot)nl>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bug or simply not enough stack space?
Date: 2009-07-17 16:17:56
Message-ID: 2759.1247847476@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Frank van Vugt <ftm(dot)van(dot)vugt(at)foxi(dot)nl> writes:
> So this took a while, but here's your test case.....
> Turns out to be quite small actually ;)

Hmm ... the relevant code change seems to have been
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-04/msg00127.php

I think I might have been overenthusiastic in trying to free resources
during a subtransaction abort. Try this patch and see if you notice
any bad side-effects.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 860 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-07-17 17:05:17 Re: BUG #4926: too few pathkeys for mergeclauses
Previous Message Greg Stark 2009-07-17 16:12:28 Re: Huge speed penalty using <>TRUE instead of =FALSE