Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> wrote:
>> So there's no way to see if a particular privilege has been granted to public. ISTM 'public' should be accepted, since you can't use it as a role name anyway...
> It's a bit sticky - you could make that work for
> has_table_privilege(name, oid, text) or has_table_privilege(name,
> text, text), but what would you do about the versions whose first
> argument is an oid?
Nothing. The only reason to use those forms is in a join against
pg_authid, and the "public" group doesn't have an entry there.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2010-06-11 04:00:48|
|Subject: Re: LLVM / clang|
|Previous:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2010-06-11 02:40:34|
|Subject: Re: ps display "waiting for max_standby_delay"|