Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Seneca Cunningham <scunning(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Date: 2005-12-02 04:03:52
Message-ID: 27504.1133496232@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patchespgsql-ports
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I trimmed it down to:
>   --with-prefer-libedit   prefer libedit over readline

OK, I can live with that.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-12-02 08:28:19
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 03:58:10
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 04:34:00
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 03:58:10
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-02 04:06:50
Subject: Re: BUG #2056: to_char no long takes time as input?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 04:02:38
Subject: Re: BUG #2056: to_char no long takes time as input?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group