| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
| Cc: | Kevin Jacobs <jacobs(at)penguin(dot)theopalgroup(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] PlPython |
| Date: | 2003-06-30 03:39:40 |
| Message-ID: | 27461.1056944380@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> writes:
> Tom Lane kirjutas E, 30.06.2003 kell 01:21:
>> Who's still using 1.5, I guess is the question? And are they likely
>> to be updating their PG installation when they're not updating Python?
> I guess that anyone who needs safe Restricted Execution will be using
> 1.5 at least for that purpose until RExec is fixed in 2.x.
I don't find that real compelling ...
The bottom line is that this has to get done. I have the time to
convert plpython to untrusted status tomorrow. I do not have the time,
the infrastructure, nor the interest to build a conditional setup.
Unless someone else wants to volunteer to make it happen in a timely
fashion, untrusted is what it will be.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gerhard Häring | 2003-06-30 04:39:30 | Re: PlPython |
| Previous Message | Kevin Jacobs | 2003-06-30 01:54:39 | Re: [HACKERS] PlPython |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gerhard Häring | 2003-06-30 04:39:30 | Re: PlPython |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-30 02:58:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support |