Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> There is a mention of QNX in tuplesort.c. Can that code segment be
> removed now that QNX is removed?
I'd leave it there. We don't have any certainty that the behavior
being worked around exists only on QNX4, and it's not like it's
costing a lot.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kris Jurka||Date: 2006-01-05 02:30:51|
|Subject: Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-01-05 02:10:36|
|Subject: Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message |