Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: QNX mention in tuplesort.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: QNX mention in tuplesort.c
Date: 2006-01-05 02:13:42
Message-ID: 27432.1136427222@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> There is a mention of QNX in tuplesort.c.  Can that code segment be
> removed now that QNX is removed?

I'd leave it there.  We don't have any certainty that the behavior
being worked around exists only on QNX4, and it's not like it's
costing a lot.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2006-01-05 02:30:51
Subject: Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-01-05 02:10:36
Subject: Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group