Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> There is a mention of QNX in tuplesort.c.  Can that code segment be
> removed now that QNX is removed?

I'd leave it there.  We don't have any certainty that the behavior
being worked around exists only on QNX4, and it's not like it's
costing a lot.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• QNX mention in tuplesort.c at 2006-01-05 01:52:10 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Kris Jurka	Date: 2006-01-05 02:30:51
	Subject: Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2006-01-05 02:10:36
	Subject: Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message