Re: \d+ for long view definitions?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: \d+ for long view definitions?
Date: 2009-09-01 18:29:12
Message-ID: 27417.1251829752@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think we should always or never show the view definition, not sometimes.

Yeah. I can live with \d not showing it and \d+ showing it --- as Peter
already mentioned, that would be consistent with \df behavior. Making
it depend on the length is just weird.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Huber 2009-09-01 18:35:04 Re: Building under Visual Studio 2008 - pqcomm.c compile error
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-09-01 18:17:31 Re: \d+ for long view definitions?