=?UTF-8?Q?Grzegorz_Ja=C5=9Bkiewicz?= <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> the foo bar example above, with notion that all columns are NOT NULL
> behaves much different now.
AFAIK the treatment of NOT IN subselects hasn't changed a bit since 8.3.
So I still find your complaint uninformative.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Scott Carey||Date: 2009-02-21 19:29:10|
|Subject: Re: not in(subselect) in 8.4 |
|Previous:||From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz||Date: 2009-02-21 17:10:16|
|Subject: Re: not in(subselect) in 8.4|