Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: LockObject patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LockObject patch
Date: 2004-12-20 19:48:00
Message-ID: 27370.1103572080@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> I just noticed that this uses the current database Id in the LOCKTAG ...
> I think I'll just make it use InvalidOid, as we will only use it to lock
> shared objects by now.  It can be changed when (and if) we need
> different semantics in the future.

In that case call it LockSharedObject, or something like that.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-12-20 20:09:31
Subject: Re: LockObject patch
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-12-20 19:01:09
Subject: Re: From latin9 to sql_ascii??

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group