Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_dump.options.diff

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Serguei Mokhov <mokhov(at)cs(dot)concordia(dot)ca>,Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>,PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump.options.diff
Date: 2003-01-04 16:02:01
Message-ID: 27332.1041696121@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> As long as we're spending time on this, why not just write our own version
> of getopt_long()?

Seems like a fine idea to me ... who's volunteering?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-01-04 16:08:05
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] v7.3.1 Bundled and Released ...
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-01-04 15:53:41
Subject: Re: Upgrading rant.

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Giles LeanDate: 2003-01-04 21:39:55
Subject: Re: Fix for HP-UX shared library builds
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-01-04 10:34:37
Subject: Re: ru: translation updates -- backend and libpq

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group