Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
Date: 2007-12-16 18:01:41
Message-ID: 27316.1197828101@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com> writes:
> Is there any particular reason not to ensure that any low-level
> threading support in libc is enabled right
> from the get-go, as a build-time option?

Yes.

1) It's of no value to us

2) On many platforms there is a nonzero performance penalty

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-12-16 18:16:18 Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
Previous Message James Mansion 2007-12-16 17:48:06 Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die