Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Regression test on FBSD 3.3 & 4.2, IRIX 6.5 (was Re: Re: Call for platforms)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl>
Cc: Alexander Klimov <ask(at)wisdom(dot)weizmann(dot)ac(dot)il>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Regression test on FBSD 3.3 & 4.2, IRIX 6.5 (was Re: Re: Call for platforms)
Date: 2001-03-27 01:20:08
Message-ID: 2731.985656008@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl> writes:
> Notice the single underscore before volatile.

That's definitely wrong --- fixed.

> Fixing this causes
> as (the SGI version, not GNU as) to choke on the '.global tas' statement.

> s_lock.c: At top level:
> s_lock.c:234: warning: `tas_dummy' defined but not used
> as: Error: /var/tmp/ccoUdrOb.s, line 421: undefined assembler operation: .global
>       .global tas
> gmake[4]: *** [s_lock.o] Error 1

Perhaps it should be ".globl"?  That's another common spelling.

Do you know whether anyone uses the GNU assembler on this platform,
or is it always SGI's?  I'm wondering if we need two versions of the
assembly code ...


I had missed the fact that s_lock.c contains some MIPS code.  Anyone
have any idea what versions of the MIPS series this code runs on?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2001-03-27 01:35:01
Subject: Re: Regression test on FBSD 3.3 & 4.2, IRIX 6.5 (was Re: Re: Call for platforms)
Previous:From: Peter BiermanDate: 2001-03-27 01:08:38
Subject: Re: Re: Call for platforms

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2001-03-27 01:35:01
Subject: Re: Regression test on FBSD 3.3 & 4.2, IRIX 6.5 (was Re: Re: Call for platforms)
Previous:From: Brett W. McCoyDate: 2001-03-27 01:16:09
Subject: Re: Starting Postmaster

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group