Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY
Date: 2000-04-06 15:31:40
Message-ID: 27282.955035100@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I am doing the chapter on temporary tables.  Should I show examples
> using TEMP or TEMPORARY?

TEMPORARY is SQL92 standard, TEMP is not.  Nuff said...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-04-06 15:38:10
Subject: Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-04-06 15:29:28
Subject: Re: 7.0 like selectivity

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group