Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Doubts about EvalPlanQual

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jacky Leng <lengjianquan(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doubts about EvalPlanQual
Date: 2009-02-19 22:50:38
Message-ID: 27235.1235083838@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
> if it is a "can't happen" scenario then why not make it an assert?

Asserts on data-consistency checks aren't really a good idea.

(IOW this is "can't happen" only as long as your database isn't
corrupt...)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2009-02-20 00:26:56
Subject: Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance ofMulti-BatchHash Join for Skewed Data Sets
Previous:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2009-02-19 22:28:07
Subject: Re: Doubts about EvalPlanQual

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group