Re: [PATCHES] to_date() validation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Alex Hunsaker" <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] to_date() validation
Date: 2008-09-11 17:34:55
Message-ID: 2723.1221154495@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I've attached a new version of the patch (version 3), as well as an
> incremental patch to show the differences between versions 2 and 3.

Applied with minimal modifications. I changed a couple of error
messages that didn't seem to meet the style guidelines, and I moved all
of the to_timestamp tests into horology.sql, rather than having
essentially duplicate tests in timestamp.sql and timestamptz.sql.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2008-09-11 18:12:39 Re: [PATCHES] to_date() validation
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-09-11 17:31:56 Re: Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2008-09-11 18:12:39 Re: [PATCHES] to_date() validation
Previous Message Kenneth Marshall 2008-09-11 15:24:38 Re: hash index improving v3