Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Weird behavior in transaction handling (Possible bug ?)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Weird behavior in transaction handling (Possible bug ?)
Date: 2005-01-14 23:44:53
Message-ID: 27168.1105746293@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Vadim Nasardinov <vadimn(at)redhat(dot)com> writes:
> On Friday 14 January 2005 16:38, Oliver Jowett wrote:
>> It might be worthwhile having commit() throw an exception if the 
>> transaction did not actually commit, rather than only reporting 
>> server-generated errors. What do people think?

> Sounds like a good idea.

Doesn't the JDBC spec have anything to say about what this should do?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-01-15 00:18:17
Subject: JDBC release schedule?
Previous:From: j.random.programmerDate: 2005-01-14 23:01:42
Subject: Re: Weird behavior in transaction handling (Possible bug ?) -- commit fails silently

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group