Vadim Nasardinov <vadimn(at)redhat(dot)com> writes:
> On Friday 14 January 2005 16:38, Oliver Jowett wrote:
>> It might be worthwhile having commit() throw an exception if the
>> transaction did not actually commit, rather than only reporting
>> server-generated errors. What do people think?
> Sounds like a good idea.
Doesn't the JDBC spec have anything to say about what this should do?
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-01-15 00:18:17|
|Subject: JDBC release schedule?|
|Previous:||From: j.random.programmer||Date: 2005-01-14 23:01:42|
|Subject: Re: Weird behavior in transaction handling (Possible bug ?) -- commit fails silently|