| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support |
| Date: | 2003-06-30 02:58:59 |
| Message-ID: | 27137.1056941939@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> So I'd propose that we put another check in inline_function(), and
> reject attempts to inline functions with polymorphic arguments.
Seems reasonable. Someday we might want to try to make that work,
but not the day before feature freeze...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-30 03:39:40 | Re: [HACKERS] PlPython |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2003-06-30 02:56:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Srikanth M | 2003-06-30 04:16:31 | Urgent : Regarding Code Submission |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2003-06-30 02:56:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support |