Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: .gitignore patch for coverage builds

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: .gitignore patch for coverage builds
Date: 2011-01-26 22:20:52
Message-ID: 27105.1296080452@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Ick. That's an awful lot of stuff to have global ignores for.

> The "coverage" directory ignore seems a little icky, but the rest
> seems unlikely to pick up anything incidental.

Tying /coverage to the root as in his V2 makes that better, but I'm
still unexcited about the thesis that we should auto-ignore the results
of any random tool somebody wants to run in their source tree.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2011-01-26 22:26:07
Subject: Re: .gitignore patch for coverage builds
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-01-26 22:20:47
Subject: Re: new compiler warnings

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group