Re: Some download statistics

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Marc Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some download statistics
Date: 2005-02-24 20:29:20
Message-ID: 27068.1109276960@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk> writes:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:35:57 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Frankly, I'd suggest dropping the splits. Thoughts?

> I also found the split sources + a non-split sources version to be
> confusing. As you, I think that splitting should be dropped.

Perhaps the confusion issue could be addressed by keeping the split
sources in a separate subdirectory:

pub/source/v.8.0.1/
postgresql-8.0.1.tar.bz2
postgresql-8.0.1.tar.bz2.md5
postgresql-8.0.1.tar.gz
postgresql-8.0.1.tar.gz.md5
split-tarballs/
postgresql-base-8.0.1.tar.bz2
postgresql-base-8.0.1.tar.bz2.md5
etc...

I suspect the demand for the split tarballs is mighty low nowaways,
but it's probably not zero yet.

Also: I notice that the README file that's supposed to tell people about
the split-tarball scheme is not present in any of the recent-version
subdirectories, so it's no wonder that they are confused.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-02-24 20:43:04 Re: Some download statistics
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-02-24 20:13:15 Where are we on stored procedures?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-02-24 20:43:04 Re: Some download statistics
Previous Message Troels Arvin 2005-02-24 20:11:54 Re: Some download statistics