Re: Have we out-grown Flex?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Have we out-grown Flex?
Date: 2012-05-02 02:38:00
Message-ID: 26946.1335926280@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Quite apart from the practical difficulties that we have with Flex
> (the fact that the authors are non-responsive and possibly retired,

btw, as far as that goes, a look into their sourceforge SCM shows
evidence of continued activity. I dunno why it's been so long since
their last formal release, but they're not dead.

> that annoying compiler warning,

http://flex.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/flex/flex/flex.skl?r1=2.213&r2=2.214

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-05-02 03:24:49 Re: Have we out-grown Flex?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-05-02 02:25:32 Re: Have we out-grown Flex?